Home | Looking for something? Sign In | New here? Sign Up | Log out
Showing posts with label highlights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label highlights. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

New study highlights dangers of so-called No-Fault ‘reform’

Wednesday, October 5, 2011
0 comments

The giant boondoggle to the state’s auto insurance companies, disguised as “PIP Choice” has been obvious to many insurance lawyers and consumer protection groups from the beginning.  But a recent Anderson study shows just how costly and harmful  No Fault ‘reform’ actually is.

Entitled “Impact of Proposed ‘PIP Choice’ Law in Michigan,” the study, which was commissioned by the Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault (CPAN), reaches four  fact-based conclusions about what will happen if the Legislature enacts the proposed insurance company wish-list of  Michigan’s No-Fault insurance laws:

1. Approximately 800 seriously injured Michigan auto accident victims will be deprived of necessary medical care each year.

2. The medical costs of providing lifetime care will be shifted to the taxpayers as these catastrophically injured accident victims are shifted to Medicare.

3. Michigan will lose between 2,500 to 5,000 jobs.

4. Profits for Michigan’s auto insurance companies (already some of the nation’s highest)  will skyrocket because, with little or no change to the amount of premium dollars collected, Michigan’s auto insurance companies will pay out nearly $100 million less per year in claims.

Currently, under Michigan’s No-Fault Law, seriously injured auto accident victims are guaranteed unlimited, lifetime medical coverage for all of their accident-related medical needs, so long as those needs are reasonably necessary for the victim’s care, recovery and/or rehabilitation.

Every year, between 850 and 1,200 car accident victims in Michigan suffer catastrophic injuries, such as a traumatic brain injury. A catastrophic injury involves medical expenses that exceed $500,000 per year.

PIP Choice will change all of this, of course.  According to the CPAN study,  it is estimated that 75 percent to 90 percent of Michigan drivers will cease to elect and pay for unlimited, lifetime medical coverage and instead, will opt for the new and cheaper medical insurance plan, which carries a $50,000 maximum coverage limit.

As an insurance attorney who helps people injured in car accidents, I see most people with serious injuries go through this in two days of emergency room care after a serious car crash.

Again, $50,000 is nowhere near enough to cover expenses associated with any serious Michigan auto accident.

The inadequacy of the $50,000 medical coverage limit is even more obvious for catastrophically injured auto accident victims.

The CPAN study estimates that with 75 percent to 90 percent of Michigan drivers opting for the minimum medical coverage, approximately 638 to 765 Michigan residents a year who suffer catastrophic injuries in car accidents will be devastated by this change.

As such, they will be forced to:

1. Go without needed medical care and treatment because of no insurance coverage.

2. Pay out-of-pocket and, ultimately, face personal ruin and bankruptcy.

3. Mistakenly rely on health insurance that does not exist (a growing number of  private health insurance plans now have specific  auto accident-related exclusions).

4. Get shifted to the taxpayers, in the form of Medicare (also problematic because Medicaid and Medicare are limited in terms of what medical services they’ll cover).

Additionally, the CPAN study reports that the funding for present and future catastrophically injured Michigan auto accident victims will be endangered, because as fewer people opt for unlimited, lifetime medical coverage, fewer people will be paying into the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association fund, which pays for victims’ injuries that exceed $500,000.

Approximately 2,500 to 5,000 jobs will be lost if so-called No Fault ‘Reform’ passes, predicts the CPAN study.

This is trickle-down economics in reverse:

As fewer people opt for unlimited, lifetime medical coverage, there will be fewer unlimited, lifetime medical claims, i.e., catastrophic injury claims, to be paid.

And, as there are fewer claims and less money being paid to the healthcare providers, demand for and the ability to pay for the same number of employees will drop, thereby resulting in terminations and lay-offs.

This is true because even though there will continue to be approximately 850 to 1,200 catastrophic claims per year, between 75 percent and 90 percent of those claims will no longer be covered by the victims’ No- Fault insurance.

As if all of that were not disturbing enough, consider how much the CPAN study estimates that Michigan’s auto insurance companies will profit from so-called No Fault “reform.”

Setting aside the fact that there are no guarantees in writing that Michigan drivers will actually save money (or how much) as a result of the dismantling of Michigan’s No Fault system, the CPAN study shows that Michigan’s auto insurance companies will experience little to no change in the amount of premium dollars they collect from Michigan drivers.

But they will experience seismic changes on the other side of the balance sheet.

According to the CPAN study, so-called No Fault “reform” will allow Michigan’s auto insurance companies to “pay out between $91 and $109 million less in claims each year …”

All of this is poetry for Michigan’s auto insurance industry.

There is only one way to avoid real harm to Michigan residents, and that is to prevent  dismantling of Michigan’s No-Fault Law in the first place.

Call your State Representative and State Senator and tell them about this important study from CPAN.

Ask why we are dismantling the nation’s best insurance system to give an unnecessary boondoggle to insurance companies that are already making more money in Michigan than in any other state.

Ask, if lowering auto insurance premiums is truly the goal, aren’t there far better ways of achieving this rather than savaging No-Fault benefits for those who will need them most, such as regulating the amount of profits that insurance companies can make in Michigan for a product (auto  insurance) that residents are required by state law to purchase?

Ask, why is Michigan one of the only states where the insurance commissioner does not have the power to regulate insurance company profits?

- Steven Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s insurance attorneys handling serious auto accident lawsuits. He frequently writes about Michigan No-Fault, and is available for comment.

Related information to protect yourself:

Michigan doctors and hospitals against No-Fault “reform”

No-Fault “reform” - bad for drivers, great for insurance companies

Your Michigan No-Fault insurance benefits

Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation with one of our Michigan insurance attorneys.


Michigan Auto Lawyers


read more

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Local blogger highlights the dangers of Chicago bicycle accidents on the lakefront trail

Sunday, August 21, 2011
0 comments

In light of the Department of Transportation Commissioner’s pronouncement in the Chicago Journal that he wants to make the city one of the most bike-friendly in the nation, a local blogger has requested he take a hard look at what he calls one of the most dangerous places for bicycle accidents in the city – the lakefront trail.

The Urban Cyclist, as he is known on his blog of the same name, said he was shocked to learn that the city’s $45 million Navy Pier Flyover plan would actually constrict the bike path at certain points, even though it is in desperate need of expansion. As a daily bicycle commuter, he has escaped serious injury in accidents with cars, cabs, and other cyclists, but an inattentive jogger on the lakefront trail left him with permanent scars on his hands.

He says the trail is basically an overcrowded highway for non-engine vehicles. Cyclists and bladers are intermingled with dog-walkers, their unpredictable pets, grandparents mindlessly walking grandkids, and various other outdoor enthusiasts who have no other option but to crowd together on the congested path.

The blogger measured the trail at 6 feet for each lane, with the new plan calling for 5 foot lanes in each direction with a 3 foot shoulder on both sides. While this is technically more space, he says the unpaved shoulder is unusable for cyclists and joggers rarely use them. He predicts the traffic and dangers will actually increase.

While he admittedly has no statistics to back up his claims, as Chicago does not keep statistics on bike-bike or bike-pedestrian accidents, he invites everyone to take a ride with him down the trail and tell him otherwise. He worries that with the Mayor and the head of CDOT aiming to make Chicago one of the bike-friendliest cities in the nation (read the story as reported by CBS news here), the increased traffic may make biking in the city even more dangerous than it currently is.

While Illinois bike crash lawyers at our office agree that the lakefront trail presents its share of hazards, inattentive drivers are still the greatest danger to cyclists in this city. Injuries to bicyclists when involved in collisions with motor vehicles often result in catastrophic injuries, and sometimes death.

The Chicago Tribune reports that drivers frequently veer into designated lanes, turn in front of cyclists, and open their doors in the path of bikers, also known as “dooring.” According to an NHTSA study, 630 cyclists were killed in traffic accidents and another 51,000 were injured nationwide in 2009, with 70% of the fatalities occurring in urban areas like Chicago. 20 of those fatalities occurred in Illinois alone. The study cites a number of things drivers can do to avoid injuring cyclists, including:

• Allowing at least 3 feet of clearance when passing a biker on the road
• Look for cyclists before opening your car door or pulling out of a parking spot
• Yield to cyclists at intersections and as directed by signs and markers
• Be especially careful to look for cyclists before making turns
• Pay attention

Cyclists have the same rights as motorists when traveling on public roads, and drivers need to make an effort to learn the rules of the road and how to properly implement cyclist awareness into their ever day driving habits.

If you have been injured in an Illinois cycling accident due to a negligent driver, please contact a Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer for a free consultation. Call (866) 99-ABELS now.


Chicago Car Accident Lawyer


read more

Friday, August 5, 2011

Pair of fatal auto accidents in the Chicago area highlights dangers of drunk driving

Friday, August 5, 2011
0 comments

Two women have been killed in separate Chicago area car crashes this month, with alleged DUI drivers being responsible for both accidents.

On July 3, a 39-year old Carol Stream man was driving in the early hours of the morning with a 30-year old woman when he failed to stop at a train crossing in Itasca, Illinois, drove through the lowered gate, and struck the engine of a passing train. According to the Chicago Tribune, the man had a blood-alcohol content of .183, more than twice the legal limit of .08. His passenger died of her injuries soon after the crash.

The man has been charged with aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, and is being held on $500,000 bail.

A week later, a 43-year old woman returning home from her job as a 911 dispatcher when a 16-year old driver, who was drunk and high on drugs, plowed into her car. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, the young driver, who was an honors student and two-sport athlete at his high school, was being pursued by police at the time of the accident.

The youth had just left a party near Old Town, where he got “drunk and high,” when he saw a man leave his SUV idling on North Michigan Avenue while he went to pay for parking. The youth stole the car and fled police after they attempted to pull him over after he ran a red light. During the pursuit, the youth ran a stop sign at the intersection of Armitage and Hoyne Avenues in Bucktown and hit the 911 dispatcher, causing her to careen into a fire hydrant. The youth escaped on foot, but was soon apprehended. Police say the teen had a blood-alcohol content of .186 and was also high on marijuana and ecstasy at the time of the crash.

The youth has been charged as an adult with first-degree murder, felony burglary, misdemeanor DUI, and two traffic citations. His bond is set at $1 million.

Drunk driving is incredibly dangerous for drivers, passengers, and pedestrians alike. Each year, thousands of innocent people are killed in alcohol-related crashes. A brief look government statistics from 2009 illustrate this grim reality:

• Out of the 33,808 driving fatalities nationwide, 10,839 of them were alcohol-impaired driving fatalities (32%) – That is roughly 1 every 48 minutes

• 1,077 teens died drunk driving crashes

• 70% of drivers involved in fatal drunk driving crashes had blood-alcohol levels above .15, and the median level was .17

• 44% of the drivers involved in fatal crashes had at least 1 prior DWI conviction

• 1.4 million people were arrested for driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol

• Out of the 911 driving fatalities in Illinois, 319 of them were alcohol-impaired driving fatalities (35%)

Sources:
- 2009 NHTSA Traffic Report
- NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS)
- 2009 Century Counsel Report- Drunk Driving Fatalities in America
- CDC Stat sheet

Drunk driving is not something that only affects those who engage in it. Innocent people who abstain from drinking and driving are killed every day. If you are injured by a drunk driver, you are entitled to be compensated and can seek the help of an Illinois injury lawyer. Call 312-924-7575 to speak directly to an attorney now.

Recent DUI blogs:

Memorial Day crash caused by drunk driver

Mayor calls for stricter rules after intoxicated city employee causes pedestrian accident

This blog was co-authored Shane Nichols, a 2013 Juris Doctor candidate from the John Marshall Law School in Chicago.


Chicago Car Accident Lawyer


read more

Friday, June 10, 2011

Model's Death in Chicago Car Accident Highlights Risk of Submersion

Friday, June 10, 2011
0 comments

A couple weeks ago model Irma Sabanovic drove into her watery death during a car accident in Chicago that left her car submerged in the Chicago River on the 1100 block of West Blackhawk Street, according to My FOX Chicago.

Now, victims and safety advocates are searching for somewhere to rest the blame and the City finds itself the focus of that wrath. The city has placed a number of reflectors and barricades in these areas in an attempt to warn motorists of the water dangers.

Our Chicago car accident attorneys understand that the water around our city, and the river running through it, pose a threat to motorists in the event of an accident. Knowing what to do in the event of a submersion accident can mean the difference between life and death.

Sabanovic reportedly neglected to notice the end of the road meeting the beginning of the river as she drove her car directly into the water. She was reportedly submerged in the water nearly an hour before she drowned.

The family of the model filed a lawsuit against the city. They claim that the city of Chicago neglected to place barricades or any significant warning signals near the scene of that accident to warn motorists of the dangers. Reports indicate that there was no signage at the site aside from one "No Outlet" sign. Abels & Annes is not affiliated with any of the parties to the lawsuit.

"(The street) was well-lit, there was a 'No Outlet' sign prominently displayed at the entrance to the street and there was an 8-inch curb at the end of the street, which is four times higher than the average city curb," spokeswoman for the city's Law Department Jennifer Hoyle said.

This accident mirrors the 1992 death of Rick Roman, Director of Improv Olympic Theatre, in which he plunged into the same river, according to the Chicago Tribune.

According to SafetyIssues.com, more than 300 motorists die from submersion accidents each year. More specifically, they drown in their vehicles. This means, more than one person dies every 29 hours from these accidents.

Safety advocates still rely on the POGO Method as the best tool to help you escape a submerging vehicle:

-Pop off your seat belt, and everyone else's seat belt in the vehicle.

-Open the window. Break it open if necessary.

-Get everyone out of the vehicle.

-Out. Once you're out of the vehicle, assess the water currents. Be sure to swim with the current to safety. Swimming against currents can only tire you and put you at a greater risk of drowning.

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident, the personal injury attorneys and wrongful death lawyers at Abels & Annes offer free and confidential appointments to discuss your rights. Call (866) 99-ABELS. There is no fee unless you win.


Chicago Car Accident Lawyer


read more

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Chicago car accidents a serious threat to teen safety as new study highlights dangers of distracted driving

Sunday, April 3, 2011
0 comments
Next » Posted On: March 15, 2011 by Dave Abels

The U.S. Department of Transportation is teaming up with Consumer Reports to warn parents and teenagers about the dangers of distracted driving.

Our Chicago personal injury lawyers urge parents to have a serious talk with their teens as spring approaches. With spring break, prom and graduation, teens will have plenty of chances to be out late on the road and may face peer pressure when it comes to underage drinking, drinking and driving and drug consumption.


View the Original article


read more